Predicting Functional Outcome One Year After Traumatic Brain Injury With CT and MRI Findings

Tone Jerstad, Cecilie Roe, Paal Ronning, Solrun Sigurdardottir, Per Nakstad, Nada Andelic

Abstract


Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative and combined impact of computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on functional outcome one year after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: This study was a prospective, population-based study of 87 patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤ 12 who were injured in 2005 - 2007 and hospitalized at Trauma Referral Centre in Eastern Norway. CT performed within 24 h post-injury was classified by Marshall classification scale. MRI performed one year post-injury was classified based on the presence or absence of diffuse axonal injuries (DAIs). The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was used as an outcome measure at the one-year follow-up. The predictions models were adjusted for clinical variables known to affect functional outcome.

Results: Using CT, small lesions (Marshall group 2) were observed in 37 (42%) patients. Signs of increased intracranial pressure (Marshall groups 3 - 4) were present in 33 (38%) patients. Using MRI, DAI lesions were found in 70% of patients. In the linear regression analysis that explored relative impact of CT, CT was a significant predictor of GOSE (p < 0.001). In the model exploring combined impact of CT and MRI, MRI accounted for a larger proportion of variance in GOSE and appears as stronger predictor (p < 0.001) than CT (p = 0.08).

Conclusions: The relative impact of CT findings of intracranial lesions in the acute settings and one-year MRI findings of DAI on functional outcome underscored the importance of using neuroimaging techniques when predicting functional outcomes after TBI. The better predictive value of MRI suggest that the detailed information about pathological brain lesions shown on late MR may help clinicians to administer more appropriate rehabilitation treatments to patients who are predicted to have a worse outcome at the one-year follow-up.




J Neurol Res. 2012;2(4):134-144
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jnr133w


Keywords


Traumatic brain injury; CT; MRI; Functional outcome

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Neurology Research, biannually, ISSN 1923-2845 (print), 1923-2853 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.neurores.org   editorial contact: editor@neurores.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.