Journal of Neurology Research, ISSN 1923-2845 print, 1923-2853 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Neurol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.neurores.org

Original Article

Volume 3, Number 2, April 2013, pages 51-55


Which is Safer to Avoid an Increase in ICP After Endotracheal Suctioning in Severe Head Injury: Intravenous or Endotracheal Lidocaine?

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Intracranial Pressure pre and post Lidocaine administration. *P values < 0.05 between Pre and Post moments; # P values < 0.05 comparison between groups.

Table

Table 1. Hemodynamic Variables and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure During the Study Period
 
Group 1 (n = 20) (Lidocaine intravenously)Group 2 (n = 20) (Lidocaine Endotracheally)Group 3 (n = 20) (Without Lidocaine)
PrePostPrePostPrePost
Average ± standard deviation; no significant difference among groups and Pre e Post moments; bpm: beats per minute.
Heart Rate (bpm)91.0 ± 13.993.8 ± 14.092.9 ± 15.7100.3 ± 18.896.3 ± 20.4104.9 ± 21.9
Mean Arterial Pressure (mm Hg)93.0 ± 20.0100.8 ± 19.896.2 ± 10.697.2 ± 10.794.7 ± 14.297.3 ± 14.0
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (mm Hg)76.5 ± 19.284.2 ± 18.382.5 ± 12.379.0 ± 13.880.8 ± 16.673.5 ± 17.5