Stimulating Aδ and C-Fibers in the Lower Limb With a 980 nm Diode Laser
Abstract
Methods: Cutaneous heat stimuli were applied at the Th12 and L5dermatome in seventeen volunteers. Conduction velocities (CV) were calculated by measuring latencies of P2 and reaction times (RT).
Results: Stimulation condition Th12no-grid showed a P2late response at 330 ± 47 ms and L5no-grid at 413 ± 53 ms. Mean reaction time during Th12no-grid was 537 ± 146 ms, L5no-grid 784 ± 334 ms, Th12grid 710 ± 195 ms and L5grid 1,391 ± 336 ms. During stimulation block Th12grid and L5grid ultra-late LEPS could not reliably be generated. Median conduction velocities (CV) and their corresponding range were calculated. The median CVRT no grid was 5.8 m/s (range 1.2 - 43.3). The median CVLEP no grid was 13.8 m/s (range 4.7 - 45.4). The median CVRT grid was 1.9 m/s (range 0.8 - 3.7). Ultra-late LEPs could not be generated, although subjects mentioned a long lasting burning pain during Th12grid and L5grid.
Conclusions: This study questions the feasibility of the ‘grid’ to reliably generate C-fiber responses. Pressing a button upon laser stimulus detection seems preferable for identifying C-fiber stimulation in the lower limb, whereas for Aδ nociceptive pathways laser evoked potentials might be of use.
J Neurol Res. 2013;3(2):56-61
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jnr177w