Quantification of Resource Utilization to Obtain Functional Recovery in Strokes.

Kazuaki Kuwabara, Shinya Matsuda, Kiyohide Fushimi, Koichi B Ishikawa, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Kenji Fujimori

Abstract


Background: The increasing elderly population will turn increased attention to the functional recovery and costs for patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Several functional scales like the Barthel index (BI) have been applied in healthcare research and handled as continuous variables for risk adjustment or main outcomes. BI is originally an ordinal variable and we tested whether healthcare resources during acute care settings were utilized evenly among patients with BI improvement, and whether the incremental cost to gain the given BI improvement varied, depending on the functional status at admission.

Methods: The study administrative database contained 337,851 CVD patients across 1,050 hospitals from fiscal year (FY) 2006 to 2009. We identified a total of 61,191 CVD patients with available BI scores among 334 hospitals participating consecutively in the 4 study years. Patient and hospital characteristics, care process, BI score at admission and discharge, length of stay (LOS) and total charges (TC) were analyzed among three BI-at-admission categories. BI at admission was categorized into the following three groups: less than 59 dependent; 60 - 84 independent with assistance, and no less than 85 nearly completely independent. The effect of a one-point BI gain on LOS and TC was determined using mixed linear regression models.

Results: A total of 22,342 CVD patients across 327 hospitals were observed to have BI improvement at discharge. Among admitted patients, 59.5% were dependent and 25.6% were independent with assistance. Dependent status at admission was frequently associated with surgical procedures, ICU accommodation, ventilation and rehabilitation, whereas patients who were independent with assistance only had increased use of ICU and rehabilitation. Better functional status at admission reduced LOS and TC. One-point gain in the BI was associated with shorter LOS in patients with dependent functional status solely, and with more TC in those who were independent with assistance and nearly completely independent

Conclusions: We observed a variation in incremental cost required for BI improvement among three functional status groups at admission. Policy-makers should be aware of the variation in cost required for a given functional gain depending on the functional status category at admission, and plan the efficient healthcare policy for CVD patients for promoting functional convalescence.



J Neurol Res. 2011;1(3):96-104
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jnr42w


Keywords


Stroke / Cerebrovascular Accident; Health Policy; Healthcare Outcomes; Resource Utilization.

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Neurology Research, biannually, ISSN 1923-2845 (print), 1923-2853 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.neurores.org   editorial contact: editor@neurores.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.