Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy After Decompressive Craniectomy: What Surrogates Need to Know

Aidan J. Jacobsen, Chase Schlesselman, Norman Scott Litofsky

Abstract


Background: Many patients require tracheostomy or feeding gastrostomy for airway stability and proper nutrition after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for trauma or stroke. Tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy implementation may impact decisions for end-of-life care. The authors hypothesized that patients surviving DC were more likely to have received a tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy than those who did not survive. Furthermore, the authors hypothesized that patients who did not receive a tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy were more likely to proceed to withdrawal of life-preserving care as the alternative.

Methods: Data collected from DC patients from 2014 to 2022 included age, admission setting, diagnosis (stroke, trauma), admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), preoperative GCS, time to decompression after presentation, and socioeconomic factors. Patients with tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy were compared to patients not receiving tracheostomy or gastrostomy for the above characteristics and their outcomes (discharge disposition, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), status of inpatient hospice/palliative care, and cause of death). Statistical tests used for analysis included Chi-square, two-sided t-test, and multiple logistic regression models (significance < 0.05).

Results: Sixty-six patients were included. More patients without tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy (32 patients) died than patients who received tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy (34 patients) (P = 0.0394). GOS and mRS did not differ between patients with tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy and patients without tracheostomy or gastrostomy (P = 0.1331 and 0.5421, respectively). Patients without tracheostomy or gastrostomy were more likely to have been placed on general inpatient hospice (GIP) (P = 0.0183) or had comfort care initiated (P = 0.00913).

Conclusions: Patients who survive after DC are more likely to have received tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy than those who did not survive. Patients who seek end-of-life care, including withdrawal of care and GIP, are more likely to not receive tracheostomy or gastrostomy.




J Neurol Res. 2024;14(2):59-67
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr779

Keywords


Decompressive craniectomy; Tracheostomy; Hemicraniectomy; Glasgow Outcome Score; Palliative care

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Neurology Research, biannually, ISSN 1923-2845 (print), 1923-2853 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.neurores.org   editorial contact: editor@neurores.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.